Within WebPA forms are used to hold the assessment elements. Here you will find examples of forms used by a wide range of academics across a number of disciplines.
Criteria: Rate each person’s ability at searching for information?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Rate each person’s ability to generate ideas and concepts?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Ability to apply sound design methodology to concept evaluation
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Rate each person’s contribution to developing the chosen concept?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Attendance?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Rate each person’s contribution to the Written Report?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: CO-OPERATION
Criteria Description: This covers attendance at meetings, contribution to meetings, carrying out of designated tasks, dealing with problems.
Scoring range: 0-5
Score 0 : no help at all
Score 1 : quite poor
Score 2 : not as good as most of the group
Score 3 : about average for this group
Score 4 : better than most of the group
Score 5 : really excellent
Criteria:COMMUNICATION
Criteria Description: This covers effectiveness in meetings, clarity of work submitted to the group, negotiation with the group, communication between meetings and providing feedback.
Scoring range: 0-5
Score 0 : no help at all
Score 1 : quite poor
Score 2 : not as good as most of the group
Score 3 : about average for this group
Score 4 : better than most of the group
Score 5 : really excellent
Criteria:ENTHUSIASM
Criteria Description: This covers motivation, creativity and initiative during the project.
Scoring range: 0-5
Score 0 : no help at all in this respect
Score 1 : quite poor in this respect
Score 2 : not as good as most of the group
Score 3 : about average for this group
Score 4 : better than most of the group
Score 5 : really excellent
Criteria:ORGANISATION
Criteria Description: This covers skills in self-organisation and the ability to organise others. It also covers planning, setting targets, establishing ground rules and keeping to deadlines.
Scoring range: 0-5
Score 0 : no help at all
Score 1 : quite poor
Score 2 : not as good as most of the group
Score 3 : about average for this group
Score 4 : better than most of the group
Score 5 : really excellent in this respect
Criteria:CONTRIBUTION
Criteria Description: This covers the overall effort put in by an individual during the Semester.
Scoring range: 0-5
Score 0 : no help at all
Score 1 : quite poor
Score 2 : not as good as most of the group
Score 3 : about average for this group
Score 4 : better than most of the group
Score 5 : really excellent in this respect
Criteria: Time management
Criteria description: To what extent were you and your group members prompt at arriving for meetings or group sessions, emailing information, or phoning etc?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Problem solving
Criteria description: To what extent were you and your group members active in providing constructive ideas, suggestions, solutions etc
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Communication
Criteria description: To what extent did you and your group members keep in touch with each other during the project?
Score Range: 1-5
Criteria: Reflection
Criteria description: To what extent were you and your group members thoughtful about what you were doing (e.g. constructive criticism, open to ideas, seeking out advice)?
Score Range: 1-5